Talk Out Loud -Soliciting Ideas for Drastic Changes 2 – Interview Milford PA’s Mayor Sean Strub

Here we continue the Epilogue of The Viral Underclass – The Human Toll When Inequality And Disease Collide by Steven W. Thrasher:

After antiretroviral medications were developed in the 1990s to treat AIDS, many white gay men in New York who had so far survived that plague used the new drugs as a ticket out of the viral underclass in which they’d recently dwelled. While HIV concentrated among people who were poor, Black, and who didn’t get those drugs, a lot of the newly medicated survivors stopped caring much about AIDS. Some of these surviving gay men bought weekend hones within a couple of hours of new York City. Still alive because of loud gay activists, they started spending their weekends in sleepy hamlets, quietly turning the word “antique” into a gerund.

In September 2020, I took my first post-lockdown reporting trip to one of those towns, or so I assumed – Milford, Pennsylvania, population 1172. When I arrived and put on my KN95 mask and face shield before exiting my rental car, I realized I’d parked near an SUV with a rear window completely converted in crudely painted letters that screamed, “Wearing a Mask & Rubber Gloves While You Are Alone in Your Car Is Like Wearing a Condom to Bed While You Are Alone!!!”. Milford was the kind of place where painstakingly restored country houses owned by some of the town’s gay male couples had “TRUMP-PENCE 2020” signs on their perfectly manicured lawns. Meanwhile, seemingly straight white men openly brandished guns at the local diner.

I had traveled to interview Milford’s most famous homosexual, Sean Strub. But even though he was the town’s Democratic mayor, Sean had not become one of those white gays who had abandoned the viral underclass. Far from it. He had not only named the idea into being back in 2011, but he had also committed much of his life to the people who lived in it ever since.

Sean was the executive director of the Sero Project, a nonprofit dedicated to helping people harmed by the criminalization of HIV. Sero had organized the 2018 conference where I first heard the term viral underclass used (though, there, it had mutated a bit into a strain different from Sean’s original usage). Recently, Sero had joined organizing efforts to flatten the rising curve of COVID-19 criminalization happening around the world.

I had connected with Sean six years earlier, when I was commissioned to write about Michael Johnson. Over the years, I had noticed how Sero was unlike many civil rights organizations I had covered in my career, in one respect: it did not demand “respectability” from the people it supported publicly. From legal advocacy to organizing letter-writing campaigns to people in prison, Sero supported anyone who had been incarcerated due to HIV and asked for its help – the kinds of people ignored by almost all advocacy groups and journalists.

After I arrived, Sean and I went for a hike in the Pocono Mountains. the pandemic had kept me cooped up for months in the city by then, and I was grateful for the chance to interview someone not on Zoom, but safely outside while walking together among trees in a glorious forest.

In COVID-19 times, some people knew a bit about ACT UP, which had directed its power externally. Its targets were organizations like the Food and Drug Administration, and its success with that agency was a reason that drug trials were already happening that summer for potential COVID-19 vaccines.

But Sean had been an activist even before that – since a time when “there was no distinction between AIDS activism and a gay activism,” as he put it. “What I think of as real AIDS activism,” he told me, “really began when people with AIDS started finding each other and organizing and came out in support groups and out of anger at the gay organizations for not listening to us.” That work was internal, and could also be called a kind of mutual aid, a concept new to many in 2020.

Sean was a part of the gays who did this decades ago. when governments around the world left us to fend for ourselves in the COVID-19 pandemic, many people looked to the example of activists like Sean as they set up Google Docs to schedule regular check-ins on their elderly neighbors, shopped for groceries for immunocompromised friends, pooled resources in their communities, and learned together about viruses in teach-ins.

Why, I asked Sean, did he keep doing this work after he got the good drugs, when so many people of his standing had stopped slumming in the viral underclass?

Saying he didn’t “begrudge people who got better and went on with their lives and other things,” he told me, “It never felt like an option for me. for one, I was so wrapped up in it.” he ran a magazine about people living with HIV, and he was close to so many people harmed not just by the AIDS virus, but by the conditions that caused it. (After Lorena Borjas died of COVID-19 in the spring, the next two people I read about online in my social circle who died were both African American HIV activist friends of Sean’s – Deloris Dockrey and Ed Shaw.)

Sean wouldn’t say it about himself, but i will say it about him: unlike many people, he didn’t allow a viral divide to develop in his life, where he saw himself as deserving and those afflicted by the social vectors that cause HIV/AIDS as suddenly undeserving. He is the rare person with privilege who leverages that privilege on behalf of people with the least – and I mean the least -social standing. he doesn’t even let prison bars keep him from trying to create an intact sense of community with other people living with HIV. When the Human Rights Campaign, ACLU, and NAACP wouldn’t even take my calls about Michael Johnson in 2014, Sean had been actively building up support for him for months. And unlike many who got the drugs and ran, Sean saw that people with viruses should not be carted off to jail; they are still part of the body politic and deserve care.

When we discussed this, it was a spectacularly sunny day, and our hike took us up a bluff high above the expanse of the Delaware Valley, to look down upon a bend in the mighty, muddy Delaware River. It’s the same river George Washington crossed on Christmas night in 1776, mythologized by Emanuel Leutze’s 1851 oil painting Washington Crossing the Delaware (which includes an enslaved Black man, Prince Whipple, whom Washington owned). But on that day, it reminded me of the mighty, muddy Missouri River, which snaked downhill from the jail in St. Charles where I would visit Michael Johnson. Unlike when I’d interview Michael, though, Sean and I were free to talk under the sun and enjoy the bounty of natural beauty around us.

Though his work had begun around viruses, his journey, Sean told me, had led him ‘deeper into understanding the systemic flaws in our society and our system. And the most satisfying work that we do is the prison work. That is, in some ways, where I feel we are being least effective at changing anything systemically, but most effective at influencing individual lives.”

Some of the people the Sero Project corresponds with (imprisoned for failing to disclose that they have a virus thirty million people live with) may never get out of prison, and there’s nothing they can do about it. While the one person I covered who was imprisoned for transmitting HIV got out – albeit, after Herculean efforts over six years – i, too, write about and work with people who will likely never escape being in the underclass, viral or otherwise.

How did Sean cope with this?

You start, he told me, by “simply acknowledging it, letting them know somebody heard them and sympathized. That’s all you can do. You need to do that. You can’t just ignore it.”

Even if it feels like there is no way to solve their crisis, “if all you can do is witness, you need to be doing that. And not to diminish the value of that.”

The novel coronavirus has made millions, if not billions, of humans consider for the first time how living with a common virus can make a person feel like a pariah.

I did not acquire SARS-CoV-2 prior to being vaccinated. And yet, before I got jabbed, even though I would never lob such a stigmatizing label at others, I deeply feared being a vector myself – even though I preach that it is societal structures and not people that are vectors. I so feared infecting others that I even had suicidal ideation, under the warped logic of thinking that if someone has to die, it might as well be me before i am a vector and accidentally kill others.

Some of this was a familiar sensation for me. As a single, gay Black man, I’ve long internalized a fear of being an undiagnosed “one in two” who could unwittingly transmit HIV to someone else; I fear this more than becoming HIV-positive myself. And as I began to overhear straight white people discussing community positively rates, trying to understand viral testing windows, and even asking each other questions like “So, when did you last get tested?” – things gay men have talked about for decades – I could tell that many people in the pandemic were suddenly struggling to process the kinds of fears that have long plagued queer folks like me.

There is tremendous power in how, for the first time in human history, all humans on the planet have been going through some version of the same thing, at nearly the same time, with the ability to communicate globally about it. “Some of us have lived here for years: that place to which others confine you when you are a ‘disease vector.’ (Even when you are not.) It’s a place where people don’t touch you or talk to you,” anthropologist and HIV activist Thomas Strong has observed. Now that billions may be having this sensation, Thomas has asked, “Will the ‘general public’ now experience this form of abjection, and therefore reject it? How will we come to terms with this? A fantasy of immunity? More walls? or careful, reflexive dialogue about the fact that we are all already polluted by each other, our bodies connected and permeable, energised and endangered by the life (vitality, livingness, flourishing, decay, dehiscence) that that connection engenders?”

What is SARS-CoV-2 finally allows us to drop “patient zero” scapegoat narratives? To release the morality plays of “Tiger Mandingo” and “COVID parties” that the extracnews media has foisted upon us? To let go of the languages of “superspreaders,” “personal responsibility,: and declaring “war” on everything? And to finally embrace notions of communal responsibility and collective care?

COVID-19 demanded that we pause and reconsider why we saw ourselves as different beings in the first place, and to ask ourselves different questions without that assumption.

Perhaps then, the most fundamental question viruses probe us to ask ourselves is: Why am I “me’ and you are “you”? if we believe that “you” and “I” are not separate, but that we face common challenges, then our hierarchies might melt away.

Racism would be gone.

Ableism would cease to exist.

Sexism, homeophobia, and cisgender superiority would all perish.

American exceptionalism wouldn’t need to exist, either, in its modern, jingoistic sennor as the insult Joseph Stalin originally meant it to mean – because the U.S. empire would be irrelevant.

The hoarding of resources through capitalism? Totally unnecessary; austerity would be replaced by anarchy and abundance.

If we accepted, as Alice Wong put it, that the world is “one big petri dish,” even speciesism would disappear, granting us perhaps our greatest chance of success at addressing the climate crisis.

In encouraging me to learn and unlearn these lessons, despite all the trauma they have caused, viruses have been among my greatest teachers. Or, rather they have the possibility to be our greatest teachers. And they offer us perhaps the best possibility of a new ethic of care – one not steeped in me getting mine first, but in us taking care of one another and of our very planet.

In this way, viruses have the potential to help us make a world predicated upon love and mutual respect for all living things, not just in the here and now, but across time and space.

To be continued ……

Talk Out Loud -Soliciting Ideas for Drastic Changes -The Viral Underclass 

There are times we are just dumbfounded and lost our ability to process information and deal with life effectively by the overwhelming pressures all seems to come at the same time – the non-stop wars, the severe Earthquake everywhere, the derailed train spill intoxicant over in Ohio causing human and nature disasters. etc…. It is shocking so many horrified events happened one after another, and many leaders in religious group and government passed away this past three years.

The latest one being Master Xing Yun who left us two weeks ago after the Chinese lunar new year. I still remember his new year greetings broadcasting just a few days earlier: ” ….Let us begin anew, and tomorrow will be better. Let us think this way,: the last year is already the past, if I have fallen short, this year I shall remedy my flaws. If in the past year, anything was left unfinished, this year is a good time for me to seize the opportunity. In Humanistic Buddhism of ours, we are promoting Humanistic Buddhism. A human world where everyone is happy, everyone is at peace, everyone is joyful and wealthy. Wealthy does not mean only money, our health is wealth, our peace is wealth, our joy is wealth, having good affinities with others can be considered as our wealth. We have wisdom, compassion, and the Dharma, all of which are our wealth. So every Spring Festival, people wish each other prosperity. In fact, wealth is within our own mind, making aspirations is wealth. …… Let us encourage each other with mutual blessings. ……”

Yes life must go on, no matter what. Even though individually our brain can get short-circuit, but join the forces together, we can form group-will and face the issue (reality) together, by tackling it one by one, one step at a time, for the benefits of all – all human and non-human, however slowly the progress may be. 三个臭皮匠,赛过一个诸葛亮! And when we are in one with the universe, that is, when we are operating under the divine principle, we should prevail.

We come to this Earth realm to take lessons. There are only two options, voluntarily or involuntarily: our soul either evolve or devolve. And in the spirit of promoting Humanistic Buddhism, I want to talk out loud on issues in whatever capacity I have, however immature and inadequate. By sharing and discussion, I hope together we may be able to come up with better understanding, and better solutions.

The past three years witness the spread of covid-19 virus that completely change our life in many ways. While the tragedy took away millions of life, causing numerous restrictions, gave rise to many drawbacks, we can not totally deny the lessons the virus teaches us. And that is the message the book The Viral Underclass – the Human Toll When Inequality and Disease Collide trying to convey. Author Steven Thrasher is an American journalist and academic, the inaugural Daniel H. Renberg Chair of social justice in reporting at (NWU)Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism focusing on LGBTQ research. He is also a faculty member of NWU’s Institute for Sexual and Gender minority health and Wellbeing. The book combines broad and deep reporting and heartrending narrative storytelling, examines the ways HIV/AIDS and other viruses strike people and communities with deliberate intention. His book is essential reading for our understanding of epidemics. His analysis of the viral underclass ring the siren alarming us with transforming unequal access to health care in a world where a pandemic heightens the brutality of inequality. Author challenges us to abandon our fatal illusions of separateness in favor of an embrace of our place in a collective entanglement of bodies. The following is an excerpt from the Epilogue of the book:

…… “My body, my choice” is a bipartisan tenet in U.S. politics scripture considered by many to be as sacrosanct as the right to stand your ground and defend your property with a gun. In the 1970s, when liberals wanted to enshrine reproductive justice in U.S. law, they did not frame their arguments in terms of wanting free abortions as part of universal health care for the entire society. They rarely articulated it as a desire for abortion at all – nor have they named abortion access much in the decades since. Instead, they frame abortion in the context of privacy and choice, encouraging society to consider intimate health matters with the same neoliberal logic that was marketing so many areas of contemporary life.

If I own my body, such logic asserts, I should be able to do anything I want with it. With an ownership mentality, if one owns one’s body, one is also freed from all social obligations to and from others. So, if it’s “my body, my choice,” then anyone can think, Yes, I can have an abortion, which is a health necessity.

But this same logic can also lead to thinking, I don’t have to join a union; my destiny is mine, and mine alone. It can also lead one down the path of believing, I also don’t want to be taxed and forced to pay for schools for someone else’s kids. Or towards feeling that If I am buying bottled water – or if I am brave and I choose to drink tap water knowing its riskswhy do I need to be forced to pay for treating the water in Flint, Michigan? And it can mean, if I don’t want to wear a mask or get a vaccine, that is my right, and the repercussions of this on those around me don’t concern me.

Across the political spectrum, “my body, my choice” can be used to conjure America’s sense of how individual ownership should supersede all else. But this notion of individuality, despite being a core element of American society. It is a myth that we are each the master of our own distinct destiny. It is a myth that the risks inherent in experiencing child-rearing, pandemics, and climate change should never be experienced collectively. And it is a belief that results in behavior with regard to one’s health, and its consequences, being seen as entirely the choice and burden (financial and otherwise) of the lone person experiencing it.

The logic of this myth works only if we pointedly ignore the hierarchies of power class, and American history. Pay no mind to the fact that the myth often comes from people who want to bust unions or who own bottled water companies. forget that an ownership mentality about individual bodies has been dangerous on the North American continent from before the birth of the United States. After all, if a body can be owned, ownership of that body can be transferred – by force of enslavement, for example.

But do consider how often we are encouraged to frame our internal thinking, in some form, along the lines of I should be able to do what I want, when I want, because its my body and my choice! Thinking I have a body is very different from thinking I am a body. This schism can make it difficult for us not only to feel in alignment with our full selves, but also to understand just how deeply we are connected to other humans – how inextricably all our fates are bound together.

Viruses challenge the concept that any one of us “has” one body. As they move freely between the lungs, bloodstream, and genitals of one of us to another, they show how we is a more relevant concept than you or me. How can any of us “own” a part of this body we all share? We can’t. And yet, so much of our thinking is wedded to this concept of my body, as if it existed discreetly.

I believe people who are pregnant should be able to end pregnancies. I also believe that if someone has an abortion, they should not have to deal with it or pay for it alone. It should be free and supported, as part of universal health care. And I believe that if someone has a child, it is not up to them alone to provide everything that child will need for the next couple of decades.

Similarly, I believe every transgender person should get the health care they need, including gender-affirming surgery. But the burden should not be on them alone; they exist in relationship with others, and it is up to the cisgender people around them to offer them gender-affirming care.

Letting go of this ownership framing wouldn’t necessarily mean letting go of agency for anyone to get what they desired. Still, it could mean letting go of the burden that everything must be shouldered alone. It certainly would require relinquishing the illusion that we are all floating specks bobbing through the universe without tie to one another. Unlike so many economic and political forces in the United States that pressure us to see ourselves as siloed and alienated, viruses offer us a deeper understanding of how to think ethically in relation to one another – and a sense of how much more power that gives us.

For any person to enjoy the benefits of lower community viral loads, breathable air, and the kind of equitable vaccination that leads to herd immunity, communal thinking is required. But true communal thinking is not nationalist thinking. By the middle of 2021, more vaccines were freely available in the United States than there were people who readily wanted them; by the end of the year, many Americans could even get a third booster shot, if they wanted. Yet even as thousands were dying in countries where people desperate for vaccines couldn’t even get one shot, many proud U.S. citizens loudly bragged about refusing to take any that were available to them. By 2022, the United States was behind dozens of other countries in its vaccination rate.

Most of us in the United States are socialized to think as consumers, not as citizens of a society with collective health responsibilities – even me. For instance, before COVID-19, I could get on planes easily and fly anywhere I could afford in the world, with little thought to how that choice affected the asthmatic Black and brown children living near the airports I departed from and arrived at, whose lungs inhaled exhaust from the jets ferrying me around. Or how the carbon footprint of my travel would affect wildfires in California or Greece.

Why did I need to think of their bodies when I thought about flying? I was free to do whatever I chose with my body, as long as I could afford the price of the ticket ? ….. because…… we asked you to go on a journey focusing on the viral underclass, so that their stories could help you rethink your most deeply held assumptions – the most deeply held assumptions, that most fundamental, largely unexamined premise we have in the United States is the belief that I am me and you are you and that each of us is the master of our own hero’s journey.

What if viruses teach us that there is no “me” and no “you” at all and that we all share one collective body? And that such individualistic thinking creates not only an underclass, but alienation across lines of class?

Think back to how viruses literally take a part of one person’s code and transfer it to another, which transforms that person individually and forever alters their offspring. As the poet and medical doctor Seema Yasmin puts it, “Eight percent of your genome/ is viral – we are literal cousines of ancient pathogens /wretched offspring of pandemics.” What if we all share just one body – a body that stretches across not just our egos and political philosophies and national borders, but even species?

When I asked disability activist Alice Wong about protests against wearing simple face coverings, she told me (through the BiPAP mask she’s worn twenty-four hours a day for years) that she just had to “wrap my head around why people don’t realize it’s no just for you. It’s for others. it just gets back to this very individualist culture” in the United States.

…… If we humans are going to survive pandemics from any virus – let alone if we are going to survive the existential climate crisis – we cannot do so while behaving as if each of our destinies were disconnected. It is not a bad thing to say we’re interdependent,” Alice continued, raising a concept foreign to many Americans. It requires courage and an acceptance of vulnerability to admit how SARS-CoV-2 has shown , as Alice put it, that “we are in the same soup. Exactly in the same soup and open to the same things. ” Our connection is not merely biophysical but cultural: This is about the invisible conditions that are swirling around us. In our air. In our atmosphere. Through our words.

……in our minds as well.

to be continued ……